IAVexcitation at 587 nm utilizing a microplate reader (Tecan infinite M1000). All numbers have been expressed as fold adjust relative to the negative handle (NC, virus only). Information shown were mean six SD from three independent experiments performed in triplicate.*P,0.05, **P,0.01 vs. the negative manage (NC, virus only). (DOC)Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: J-PD K-SL G-FW. Performed the experiments: J-PD X-FZ JZ J-CY. Analyzed the data: W-ZL X-FZ QYW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: X-XC JZ. Wrote the paper: J-PD K-SL.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc (Oct-Dec 2013) 13(four):541?45 DOI 10.1007/s13191-012-0162-ORIGINAL ARTICLEComparison of Retention of Provisional Crowns Cemented with Short-term Cements Containing Stannous Fluoride and Sodium Fluoride–An In Vitro StudyBhuvana SachinReceived: 13 December 2011 / Accepted: 17 July 2012 / Published on line: 27 July 2012 ?Indian Prosthodontic SocietyAbstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact from the addition of stannous fluoride (SnF2) and sodium fluoride (NaF) to luting cements around the retention of provisional crowns. Provisional crowns were fabricated making use of methyl methacrylate and bis-acryl composite resin for 32 chamfer ready molars.Chroman-7-amine Order For control group A, crowns were cemented with Freegenol and RelyX Temp NE non-eugenol cements. For test group B, crowns have been cemented applying the above cements together with the addition of SnF2. For test group C, crowns were cemented applying the above cements with the addition of NaF. The specimens were thermocycled and retention test was performed right after 7 days.3-Iodo-1H-1,2,4-triazole Data Sheet The addition of SnF2 significantly enhanced the retentive strength of each the cements inside the array of 27?eight , whereas addition of NaF decreased the retentive strength of both the cements inside the range of 14?three .PMID:24563649 SnF2 is often mixed with non-eugenol luting cements to enhance the retention of both methyl methacrylate and bis-acryl composite crowns. The different effects of NaF and SnF2 on retention indicate that it might be useful to possess two distinctive kinds of provisional luting cements for short-term and long-term cementation, as suitable. Search phrases Provisional crowns ?Stannous fluoride ?Sodium fluoride ?Retentive strengthIntroduction Biologically acceptable fixed prosthodontic remedy demands that the ready teeth are to be protected and stabilized by a provisional restoration till the cementation in the final restoration. The restoration sometimes functions for extended periods while adjunctive therapies including periodontics, endodontics, orthodontics, or oral surgery are being completed [1]. Long term provisional restoration are far more susceptible to cement washout, marginal leakage, bacterial infiltration, and caries. So luting agents must have good mechanical, retentive, and antibacterial properties for the good results of a lengthy standing provisional crowns. Since fluoride components have antibacterial properties, many research happen to be performed by adding fluoride to luting cements. Levinstein et al. [1, 2] found that fluoride varnish (Duraphat) mixed with provisional luting agents enhanced the 1 h retention and 7 day retention from the provisional crowns by 69?45 . In a single more study, the addition of stannous fluoride had shown no effect on the retention of short-term acrylic crowns cemented with zinc oxide eugenol cement and improved the retention of those cemented with non-eugenol zinc oxide cement, right after 7 days of cementation [3]. These above research had been condu.
